The world is at what is likely to be the most critical moment of the 21^st century. The choices we make in the coming weeks, months and years will set us on a course either to liberation or destruction. Quite frankly, there is no in-between. We all have a part to play in this, humanity’s most important choice, one that will define the world for generations to come.

Critical decisions such as these are not going to be easy. There are going to be plenty of challenges to overcome. And there will be adversaries who do all they can to misguide society, to lead them into the deep, dark abyss of societal destruction and despair. These adversaries are not necessarily members of the general public, but those who people would generally trust because of their positions within society. These are politicians, bureaucrats, health officials, doctors, nurses, scientists. These are people who have everything to gain from instilling fear in the public, from coercing them to get an experimental jab, from subverting society to their every will.

Of course, not all people in these positions of power and trust have a sinister agenda. There are some, in fact likely many, who are well and truly against the accepted narrative, yet if they attempt to speak out on the truth of the matter they are heavily censored. Some do not speak out due to intimidation, a tactic that works incredibly well when a person is dependent on their job to keep food on the table and a roof over their head. Those who do manage to speak out and get past the censorship find themselves being labelled “fake” or “conspiracy theorists” and even discredited by medical boards or others in their profession for going against the grain.

But that’s real science. Being the one who questions the narrative and demonstrates that the reality is much different to the web of lies being spun is true science, and it is heroic. People have been psychologically conditioned over the last decade or two to believe that consensus is science. This has been evident in the supposed “science” of climate change, a naturally occurring cycle which has been evident in the world since the Earth’s beginning. The accepted narrative in this case is that anthropogenic global warming is the reality, caused by carbon emissions from energy sources like coal and gas. Any scientist who attempts to discredit that is subject to attack from those within the profession and are cast aside as frauds, their papers tossed into the trash (A good example of this is Queensland scientist Dr Peter Ridd, who was dismissed by James Cook University after criticizing research conducted by his colleagues, particularly pertaining to climate change and the Great Barrier Reef. The Reef, which those that spruik the climate narrative claim has become discoloured and is dying due to climate change/global warming and bleaching is in reality undergoing cycles which cause it to be this way for a period of time before it regains its colourful nature, something Ridd has been vocal about. His papers on the matter were never accepted and published due to their content not aligning with the accepted narrative).

Protecting the narrative is one of the most important things for those who set and control it. If someone begins to poke holes in the narrative, slowly releasing the truth that is contained within, all that those who created it have built begins to crumble, the web of lies begins to unravel and those who have been corrupted to the core are exposed as such. Even questioning the narrative to a slight degree is unacceptable. But they have tactics for controlling it. They can change the narrative ever so slightly at a moment’s notice so as to tailor it to their liking, to fit their own agendas. They can shift the goalposts to ensure they gain more control. But doing something like this too fast is bound to gain unwanted attention and poses a significant risk to the survival of the narrative itself. That is why they do it slowly. They tweak it little by little. They chip away at society bit by bit, achieving small victories each time. Without people noticing, they condition the general public to believe whatever they tell them. There is a lot of strategic maneuvering and psychological tactics involved in this process. They might tell people that what they are doing is for the common good. They might bring out people to talk to them who seem trustworthy on the face, maybe because of the way they are presented, or their position in society.

Sound familiar? That is because this is exactly what has been occurring throughout the era of COVID-19. Those in positions of power have been slowly but surely chipping away at our freedoms, taking them from us one by one. They have been implementing restrictions and lockdowns that allow them to maintain control on society. Under the guise of public health, they have been giving themselves seemingly unlimited power. They have been bringing out so-called “experts” to tell us that all that is being imposed upon us is based on “health advice”, which we never actually get to see, no matter how many times we ask. They tell us it is all for our own health and safety, all for our own good, all for the common good. And that right there is the big lie. This is not for our own good, but for the good of those who rule over us. And they are slowly chipping away at society itself, hoping for its collapse, hoping that they will be able to change it into something that resembles a living hell, where they have all the power, all the control, and we are forced to live the way they want us to.

Division is running rife throughout society at the current time. Those in power are creating it and stoking the flames. They are pitting us against each other. It is already evident in that people are ringing the police to report people they see not complying with arbitrary restrictions. They might see someone at the shops not wearing a mask. Instead of being a decent person and minding their own business, there are plenty of people whose first instinct now is to call the cops. Police and authorities are coming down harder on those who commit COVID “crimes” than those who commit real crimes. There have been incidences of people being arrested and denied bail because they did not wear a mask (and just on masks – they’re useless. Most of the masks people are wearing to “protect” themselves from the virus are not going to do so. The virus particles are small enough to get through the pores of the mask, whether it be a medical or cloth mask. It is worth noting that surgical masks only work for surgeons because they wear them properly, and if they touch their mask it is no longer sterile and must be replaced with one that is. You are more likely to give yourself bacterial pneumonia from wearing a mask, something which occurred largely in the era of the Spanish Flu, where most people died as a result of secondary bacterial respiratory infections, or bacterial pneumonias, resulting from mask wearing. Many of these people would have likely survived if they had not contracted such illnesses). Just recently, there was a man in Perth sentenced to seven months in prison for allowing visitors to his place of residence when he was quarantining at home. Meanwhile, others who commit real and terrible crimes are given lighter sentences, and even permitted bail. The system is entirely backwards, and the world has been turned upside down.

Over the past few weeks of lockdown in New South Wales, there have been thousands of calls to CrimeStoppers from people dobbing in others for not following arbitrary rules that have absolutely no place in a nation that is supposedly “one and free”. This number is concerning, not only because it is so large, but because it signifies a greater problem within society. In George Orwell’s political dystopia of 1984, citizens report each other to the authorities of the ruling class, the Party, who swiftly swoop in and arrest and punish the reported individuals. This is all done in the name of the so-called “common good”. Similar occurrences have been seen in relatively recent history. In Nazi Germany, people reported to the authorities where the Jews were hiding, effectively sentencing their fellow citizens to imprisonment in concentration camps, and, for many, death. In the Soviet Union, there were also many occurrences of people reporting their others in the community to the authorities, who would arrest these individuals and send them to Gulags, a system of labour camps and accompanying detention and transit camps and prisons that the Soviets used for political prisoners and “criminals” (many of these so-called criminals had done no wrong and were knowingly wrongfully imprisoned, or imprisoned because of a petty accusation made by another member of society). Those that were in the gulags often faced harsh punishment. Oftentimes citizens were taken by the authorities for questioning, whereby they were interrogated and essentially tortured until they admitted to doing something they never did, often “incriminating” others in the process (more can be read about all of this in The Gulag Archipelago, a book written by Soviet survivor Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who spent time on both sides of the Soviet Union, eventually being exiled).

These examples are all relevant to the current times. Yes, it may seem harsh comparing what we are facing now to the Holocaust and the Soviet Union, however the notion of turning citizens against each other remains. From the beginning of COVID-19, those in power have been slowly wearing us down and turning us against one another. They do this under the guise of caring for us, but in reality it is just a self-serving strategy to obtain complete control of society. It is again important to understand that there are significant psychological aspects to what is occurring here. Take the lockdowns for example. The lockdowns are draconian and have been shown to be ineffectual in preventing the spread of the virus. In fact, locking people inside their homes with infected relatives just serves to increase case numbers, where each member of an infected household is likely to contract the virus. But the government imposes lockdowns regardless. Why? It has practically nothing to do with curbing the virus. Instead, it is to make the general public feel that the government is protecting them, keeping them safe, and taking the situation seriously. It is purely psychological. While you think you are being protected from the threat loose in the world, the real threat is the one that claims to be protecting you – the government. They pose a threat to your freedom, your civil liberties, your income, your livelihood, and your health (especially mental health). But with the constant fearmongering of the virus and reinforcement that they are doing this for your own good, aided by the media and police, they are wearing people down to the point of submission, where people see it is better to side with those in power in a misguided hope that they will regain their own freedoms. This is not going to happen, as is already evident in that those who are vaccinated are still subject to lockdowns and restrictions. Vaccinated or not, however, all people should have their freedoms, not just those who comply with what the government and bureaucrats want.

It goes without saying that the government cannot be trusted. But just to hit that point home, consider this: they now claim to be the arbiters of truth. Just recently, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said of her government:

“We will continue to be your single source of truth.”

And of other information:

“Remember that unless you hear it from us, it is not the truth.”

These statements should send a chill down the spine of anyone who with even a modicum of sanity. They are Orwellian, reminiscent of something the Party of 1984 would say. In Orwell’s dystopia, there are several Ministries that control all aspects of life in the nation. One of these is the Ministry of Truth, which controls information and can change it to resemble what furthers the interests of the Party (the government) at a moment’s notice. Nobody can even question this. Any and all other information is deemed false and dangerous. This is where we are headed when governments claim to be the sole authority on what the truth is. But know this: The government have a flimsy relationship with the truth. They often misinform to serve their own agendas. When a politician or bureaucrat or “expert” keeps saying you can trust them, keeps attempting to reinforce this point, chances are they only keep repeating that to you to condition you into thinking they would never lie to you. They will repeat a lie a thousand times or more to the point where it will seem like the truth. Repeating the same lie over and over does not make it true. But some will fall for it, and it will be at the expense not only of truth, but of society.

The way society is now cannot stand. We have an important decision to make. We can either continue down the path of least resistance, where we end up in a state of complete government control, our lives, and the way we live them subject entirely to the will of the ruling class. Any sense of “freedom” will be worthless; it will not be true. Our lives will practically no longer be our own. We will end up living in a society resembling that of Orwell’s 1984. And that is not a world in which anyone sane would want to live.

Or we can choose to push through the path of great resistance. This is the one where we fight, where we push back against the government narrative, where we demonstrate how the people who lead us are unable to be trusted, especially with our lives, our rights, and our civil liberties. Make no mistake, this path will not be easy. But the path of righteousness and truth seldom is. It is often easy to just give up and let things play out. It is easy to allow others to do the work for us, rather than doing it ourselves. But there are agendas at play here. Those who speak truth to power are often censored, only because what they say will bring down the narrative that those who seek great power and control pervade. They attempt to pit society against those who speak it. As George Orwell once said:

“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.“

So stop putting blind faith in the government. Stop putting blind faith in “the science”. Be skeptical when they claim they are telling you the truth. Chances are they are telling you their version of the truth, which is often a contrived narrative of their own that suits their own agenda. And question everything these people in power tell you. If they tell you someone with COVID passed away, it is important to know whether that person died from the virus or with the virus. Also take into account their age and prior medical conditions – a lot of people with severe symptoms, in hospital, or who have died either have one or more co-morbidities or are elderly. But they will not tell you that inconvenient truth.

This is undoubtedly one of the most critical moments in history. Our choices from here on out, especially with regard to COVID, the way we act and live, our leaders, and the degree of control we allow them to have, will determine the fate of this nation. They want us divided, but divided we fall. Now is the time to stand united. Now is the time to stand in arms with one another, all of us together against the tyrannical rule of our leaders, to be truly one and free.

Truth and society itself are under attack. It is up to us to free ourselves and take back our country before those who rule it destroy it completely.

Just a few months ago, as the beginning of the vaccine rollout in Australia approached, Prime Minister Scott Morrison promised us they would not be made mandatory. To those of us who were privy to the ways in which politicians and the media act and set the narrative, we knew this was a lie from the get-go. Yet there were many who again naively believed the words that a career politician spoke. And therein lies the problem. Since when are politicians known to stick to their promises, to abide by their word?

After another convenient outbreak leading into the school holiday period in New South Wales, resulting in most of the State going into lockdown for the two weeks it spans, National Cabinet, the government body that has been utterly detrimental to this nation, has met to determine the nationwide response. Already most States and Territories have introduced restrictions, border closures, mask mandates, and even lockdowns, even where there are zero cases present. Some would say this is cowardice. Others (who typically follow the government like sheep) would deem it necessary to “keep people safe”. But not me.

I see it as a concerted act with a purpose. The vaccine uptake in Australia has not been as high as politicians would have hoped. Clearly, the number of individuals skeptical of the experimental vaccine is far greater than the government and their propaganda arms in the media are letting on. So it would stand to reason they have devised a strategy to push the vaccine harder, and essentially make it mandatory. Allow me to explain.

The whole gist of this lies in emotion and psychology. They need to be able to compel people to take the jab without appearing to compel them to. So how do they do this? They take your holidays from you. They take occasions where people gather in joy and happiness. Notice how every time there is an “outbreak”, it always seems to occur around a holiday period, or a public holiday, or even religious holidays. For example, last year we were restricted on Easter and Christmas. We have faced restrictions on New Year’s, Mother’s Day, and Australia Day among others. And now NSW just happens to be in a lockdown that spans the entire school holiday period. Sure, at first it may have seemed like it could be written off as pure coincidence. But it is now difficult to see it that way.

It was predictable that they would impose such restrictions and lockdowns again around the time of a holiday period, when people usually spend time with their families and friends, when they go out, go away on holidays. But the reasons as to why are also predictable in nature. They are doing this to compel us all to get the jab. They are attempting to incentivize it in their own way, by saying that if enough people get the vaccine, we will not have to lockdown anymore.

Currently, even people who have the jab are still in lockdown, still subject to restrictions. So it seems worthless to even get it. Sure, it may reduce your symptoms if you contract the virus, but the recovery rate is extremely high. So it stands to reason that people would be averse to getting the vaccine. In fact, those who are skeptical of the vaccine are rightly so. And that is what makes the following revelations even more nefarious.

Now keep in mind when reading the following that the Chief Medical Officer of Australia, Paul Kelly, said at a Senate Inquiry when asked by Senator Malcolm Roberts if the vaccines were 100% safe: “I can’t say that they’re 100% safe”. The representative from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) also could not assure the Inquiry of the efficacy nor long-term outcomes of the vaccines.

National Cabinet have determined a set of new rules and regulations to be implemented across the country. Of the new rules, two set an extremely dangerous precedent for the coming months and years: Mandatory vaccinations for all aged care workers, and allowing Australians of any age to get the AstraZeneca vaccine under new indemnity arrangements.

Let us first address the latter, given it will provide the reason for which the former is so insidious. We already know the AstraZeneca jabs have been subject to many issues, including blood clots. We know people have died after having the jabs. The problematic occurrences have, over the last few weeks and months, pushed the government and TGA to change their stance on AstraZeneca several times, including limiting the vaccine to certain age groups (60+), and subsequently ruling it out altogether, telling Australians that if they have not yet had their first jab that they should get the Pfizer vaccine instead. The Minister even told us it was unsafe for the majority of the population.

But suddenly they have backtracked somewhat, telling us we can go and get the AstraZeneca jab so long as we sign over our indemnity rights. What does this mean? We know that, thus far, the companies who have created and produced these vaccines, which have in the not-so-distant past paid out billions of dollars in damages collectively, have recused themselves of liability from any problems that occur with their vaccines, which of course includes any adverse effects which occur in the long-term. The government have also recused themselves of liability. Now, under the new arrangements made in National Cabinet, GPs will also be free from liability, at least for the AstraZeneca vaccine. This means that if something goes wrong, and you end up suffering as a result, you cannot hold anyone who should be liable accountable. And just confirm the dangers of this vaccine, the head of the Australian Medical Association (AMA) has since stated his shock at the government’s decision and has aired his disagreement with the Prime Minister on the matter, warning people, especially those under 40, not to get the AstraZeneca vaccine.

That is why making the vaccines mandatory for anyone is particularly despicable. The government know they cannot be held liable for any issues that arise from the vaccine over the coming months and years. That is why they have no issue supporting mandatory vaccinations. Now some may say, “It’s just aged care workers.” And to them I would say “Have you been living under a rock for the last year and a half?!” Have people not been paying attention throughout the era of COVID-19? These are the kind of buzz phrases that politicians, bureaucrats, media, and their lackeys have been using the whole time. “It’s just two weeks to flatten the curve”; “It’s just a mask”; “It’s just to slow the spread”; “It’s just a few more weeks”; “It’s just an app”; “It’s just until we get a vaccine”; “It’s just until everyone gets the vaccine”.

For pity’s sake people. It is not just. It is completely unjust. It’s disturbing is what it is. Those in power are a greater threat to this nation than the virus itself. Mandatory vaccinations for aged care workers are just the beginning of a slippery slope that descends into complete COVID tyranny. Next they will start making it mandatory for other sectors, be it hospitality, education, or whichever else. Soon enough you will not be able to go to church, or even the shops, without having the jab. They will segregate society into vaccinated and unvaccinated. The vaccinated will be given back some of their freedoms. The unvaccinated will be heavily restricted, treated like criminals, their homes becoming their prisons. Vaccination passports will no doubt become a reality. And yet, the vaccines do not prevent infection nor transmission. So the vaccinated could still easily contract the virus and spread it.

Currently, Scott Morrison has said that they will not even consider opening up or treating the virus as if it is the flu until at least next year. Even if the majority of Australians were vaccinated, lockdowns will continue to occur intermittently. All he will possibly consider is some relaxing of quarantine arrangements next year. That’s it. That is all they’ll do. This is tyrannical. There is no other word for it. Governments are not meant to intervene so heavily in the medical autonomy of their citizens. It is not the role of the government to dictate the risks people take to their own health. All they should do is provide advice and facilitate options. They should not force nor compel people to take certain risks, including with the vaccine. This kind of thing was what the Nuremberg Code was designed to prevent. In fact, the Australian Immunisation Handbook states that consent for vaccines “should be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation”. It also takes from a core principle of the Nuremberg Code which reads:

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”

Note that the government are doing all they can to coerce you to get the vaccine, including mandating vaccines, which means if you refuse you will no longer be able to work in certain industries. It is also likely they will begin to impose further restrictions specifically on those who are unvaccinated, again in an attempt to coerce you to get vaccinated. This is a clear breach of the Nuremberg Code, of which Australia is a signatory, and by extension the guidelines set forth in the Australian Immunisation Handbook.

Further, they are in violation of the Australian Constitution, of which Subsection 51(xxiiiA) states:

The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:

(xxiiiA) the provision of maternity allowances, widows’ pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances

Vaccine mandates are a form of “civil conscription”.

Those in power will continue to fear-monger. Fear is their ultimate weapon in these times. If they can continue to instill fear in the population, or at least in enough of the population, they can continue their reign of tyranny unchecked. The media may at times seem like their worst enemy, but they are in reality their greatest ally, as the constantly propagate fear of the virus in their programs. Even political commentators who are usually beacons of common sense have started pushing the vaccine and supporting the government’s mandatory vaccination policy. Some have even gone so far as to suggest the vaccinated should be allowed their freedom while the unvaccinated should remain subject to harsh restrictions and lockdowns. In essence, they want to medically segregate society.

It is pertinent to note as well that the harshest of restrictions, including lockdowns, always seem to be imposed by each State right around the time their State of Emergency is about to expire. It provides them with an excuse to extend it time and time again. They will continue to jump at the opportunities new variants of the virus present. But allow me to make something clear: there will always be new variants.

This virus is not going away, no matter how many people we vaccinate, no matter what restrictions we put in place. What is clear is that this virus has adapted in such a way that it is not going to kill itself off, unlike other viruses that mutate to become more potent, killing themselves off relatively quickly. What is evident from what has been labelled the Delta strain is that it is less potent than previous variants of COVID-19. Yes, it appears to be more infectious, however this does not mean we should fear it, panic, and lock everything down again. Viruses like this become more infectious but less potent as they progress. It is not abnormal behaviour. No matter how much the media, politicians and health bureaucrats tell you otherwise, this variant is not something we need to be panicking about. And it does not warrant further lockdowns and restrictions.

If anything, Australia needs to take a leaf out of Singapore’s book: No more restrictions, no more lockdowns, no more daily press conferences, no more announcements of case numbers, no more counters on the sides of our television screens with case and vaccine tallies, no more extensions of emergency powers, no more fear.

Each of us should be given back our God-given rights and freedoms. Each of us should live our lives as we wish, assessing our own risks and the risks to our health and taking whatever actions we deem necessary for ourselves. If you want to get vaccinated, go ahead. If you don’t, good for you. No-one should be restricted based on their vaccination status. No one should be alienated based on what should be a choice. Same thing goes for masks. If you want to wear a mask, feel free to. If you don’t, that’s perfectly fine. These things are frankly nobody else’s business but your own.

Our lives on this Earth are far too short to be subjected to COVID tyranny. This authoritarianism that has managed to pervade society has become a disease, and it is doing more harm to our world than the virus. Take a stand. Fight back against the tyrannical abuses of power both Labor governments and our so-called “liberal” governments are perpetrating upon this nation. To all those facing vaccine mandates in their industries, push back. If enough people threaten to strike or quit, the government may be forced to retract their despicable new rules. Stop worrying, stop fearing the virus, and start living your lives at your own risk, rather than at the government’s.

And just a final note to all those who will inevitably disagree with me, who will say that this is all hearsay, that it is all one big conspiracy theory. Think about this: You cannot sue them because they’re indemnified. You cannot talk about it on social media because they will censor you, or even permanently suspend your account. You cannot protest because of their restrictions, because they’ll fine you or arrest you. You cannot choose to take hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin because they are restricting them, practically deeming them illegal, despite their rate of success in treating COVID-19. Doctors who have pushed against the acceptable narrative have had the full force of the narrative-holders come down against them, discrediting them, making them out to be conspiracy theorists. How much more obvious does it need to be for you all to see that there are sinister agendas attached to all this?

COVID tyranny is well and truly here. It’s up to us to fight against it.